Total Pageviews

Monday, December 27, 2010

Thinking about supporting Sarah Palin?

Just in case you were wondering what to really think about that good old down home, conservative "Christian" Sarah Palin Click and Listen

So you say your a Christian?

With the New Year less than a week away and all the "New Year Decisions" that will be made, the most important decision you can make is to be right with God, so the question is... Are You? listen to these messages and then "Examine yourself to see whether your in the Faith or not" Click Here,   and scroll down then click download to listen.

Happy New Year!!

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Christmas eve 1914, the night that could have changed history.

That's right, just imagine f what these men did on Christmas eve was allowed to be carried out to the obvious end (which being the WWI would have ended), had it not been for the "World Defenders of Liberty and Freedom" , who insisted that the men who had no grudge against one another, continue the slaughter of each other.


Think of all the Fathers that would be Grandfathers and Great-grandfathers today, of all the grandchildren that would be here today, of all the 6 million Jews that would not have been slaughtered because there would have been no Hitler. That's right, there would be no Hitler if it hadn't been for WWI. Anyway read this and just imagine what it would be like today if only......... here

The Military considers Pre-Millennialists dangerous.

SO the Military, defending freedom around the world for all U.S. citizens, considers some of it's very own (Christians),as a danger to it's leaders(the U.S.government) plans of a one world government. Read and let it sink in what our "defenders" of freedom think about us-Here  
(You can also watch the video sermon by clicking the link on the article)

In case you are wondering what Pre or Post Millennialism is, Pre-Millenniallists believe that Christ will return after the tribulation and set up His 1,000 year reign as King of the world as promised by Scripture, Post Millennialists believe He will come after the Church takes over the world and then Christs comes back to Reign. Which is wrong.

Which ever position one may hold (I'm a Pre-Millennialist) the point is, if you believe that Christ is coming back to take over, then you are the Enemy.

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Gays in the Military

So now it is "legal" to admit your sodomite lifestyle in the U.S. Military, I can just here the Christians now " Oh how terrible, how awful, how wicked.
Now don't get me wrong IT IS WICKED AND AN ABOMINATION, but where have us Bible thumping Baptists (and non-Baptists) been all these years and why have are voices not cried aloud the fact that the military allows our "beloved troops" to visit whore houses and participate in adultrious affairs hmmmm?

Why is it that we have been OK with the don't ask don't tell policy since Clinton, knowing that the Sodomites have been there all along? what , as long as they don't talk about it out loud then it's OK? Why do we not get as outraged that women are "serving their country" and fighting on the front lines and flying fighter jets while their children are at home being raised without them?

 You will say "God is gonna judge America for this", wake up, we have been under the judgment of God for years, the fact that we have all this mess is because we as a nation and as Christians have left the Word of God and by doing so the principal of Galatians 6:7 is automatically implemented, God does not even have to judge us now (although He will) we are simply reaping the seeds we have sown through are humanistic philosophy that has been taught through the public education system. Such as women's rights etc.

Another topic that should be dealt with instead of the "don't ask don't tell" policy is, does our military even have the right to do anything it does today? Such as, is it moral and Godly to invade nations, set up governments that we can manipulate and do as we command? do we have the God-given moral obligation to blow millions of innocent Arab women and children who have never threatened us in any way, straight to the grave?

(As a side note here it is strange that we are totally against abortion, because we abhor the taking of innocent life but, we have no problem Murdering innocent little "Muslim" children simply because they are Muslim and not Christians, I guess the Catholics had it right all along during the dark ages then huh? you know kill all non-Catholics.)

How would we react if some country set up shop in our back yard, told us what to do and if we don't comply they will call us "terrorists" make us look evil in the sight of the world through a corrupt news media that does the government's bidding (whether it is a republican warmonger, or a liberal sellout) and then blow us "straight to Hell".

Wake up Christians, you say you believe the Bible, every word right? Then please show me where we as Christians have any right to go along and support this "American" empire-building, Nation destroying, freedom stealing, innocent life taking out right ungodly government. And it does not matter which of the two parties you belong their both the same.

America has the "Blood of the innocent" on it's hands and not just the blood of the unborn either, we as Christians must Repent of our wicked ways in supporting this murderous attitude worldwide, all in the name of God!!!

Saturday, December 11, 2010

The Basics of the Faith!

Want a good way to learn or do you need a refresher course on the basic foundational beliefs of our faith? Then listen or download all these - Sermons!

Thursday, December 9, 2010

WikiLeaks!

Just in case you wondering about this whole Wiki Leaks fiasco, here's an article to read. And if you think that keeping up on these issues, and how we should respond is unimportant, well, your just who the Government is looking to recruit into their family. Wake up and get informed, stop watching your Soap's and realize the noose is getting tighter everyday. Read- Here

Free guide

n connection with the previous post here is a cut out guide for you to keep with you, when you need to invoke your right to remain silent, remember to read and re-read, the previous post and then download this pocket guide to keep with you. Down load- Here

I'll bet you didn't know this!

As one historian stated  'those who win the war write the history' (not a direct quote), here are some articles that will reveal the truth about the "War of Northern Aggression", which is what it has rightly been called rather than the "Civil War", since there was nothing civil about it. Read- Here.

Also read-The real Lincoln

For more reading click on the links posted at the bottom of the article.

You do have the Right to remain silent!!

In a time when we as a people are intimidated by the State into thinking we must comply, it is important to know your rights read -Here

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Why are we here.

Watch this with all your attention, and then ask yourself " is what I am living for and striving to gain really worth anything"  -Watch, 

and -Here

Books you must read

Here  is a list of great books ( some are booklets ), real easy to read, on war through a Biblical perspective as well as the truth about some of the wars that we have been in. All written by a Independent Baptist

here, here, especially here

Here are several more by  a couple different authors-

here, here, here.

it may seem like a lot but, what is more important than knowing the truth, I am using these books in our home school and you should to, don't get your history from the protestants or ,Limbaugh, Hannity or even BECK.

The perfect Christmas gift

Just in time too, get your kids this gift , then we can desensitize them to prepare them to be obedient to the Police State - Read here

This is a parody of course, intended to make fun of the TSA ( which stands for 'Total Sexual Assault').

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Todays devotion

Enjoy this audio devotion from a baptist preacher and theologian from the1800's-

Listen -Here

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Breast milk Terrorism

It's a good thing George Bush gave us the TSA, and Obama is steppin' up support for their tactics, otherwise who would stop all the Angry breast feeding Non-Muslim women from bombing our airports like those people that flew the Airplanes into the Twin Towers, because we all know that it couldn't be Muslims right? That's why we don't search and grope them!! Read Here.

Wake up and call your U.S. and State congressman and tell them how sick you are of this! And if you fly refuse the groping and scanner and film everything.

Free Speech or Tax payer funded Blasphemy

Although free speech should always be upheld, what should the Christians attitude be towards this so called "art", and should it have been taken out of the exhibit because of pressure and if so for what reason. Before you answer, think about why you think it should have been taken out, keeping in mind free speech and the fact that as Christians we sholud not cave to pressure because what we believe is offensive to some.

Hint: There is only one reason in this article that should guide your answer as to why or why not it should have been removed, so read carefully. This is an exercise to get you to think about how to properly answer those who accuse us of not allowing free speech to all, which we should do, even though it may be repulsive as this so-called "art" is.

don't be scared.


The link is down you can read here,

Ant-covered Jesus video removed from Smithsonian after Catholic League complains (video)


Video
This is part of the 4-minute video, created by the late artist David Wojnarowicz titled 'A Fire in My Belly,' that the National Portrait Gallery removed from the show, 'Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture.'

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 1, 2010; 12:00 AM
Officials at the National Portrait Gallery on Tuesday removed a work of video art depicting Christ with ants crawling over him after complaints from a Catholic organization and members of Congress.

The four-minute video, created by the late artist David Wojnarowicz, had been on exhibit since Oct. 30 as part of a show on sexual difference in American portraiture.
The piece was called "hate speech" by Catholic League president William Donohue and a misuse of taxpayer money by a spokesman for Rep. John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), the presumptive incoming House speaker.
Officials at the museum and the Smithsonian Institution, which includes the Portrait Gallery, said they had not intended to be offensive by showing the work and removed it to better focus on the exhibit's strengths.
"The decision wasn't caving in," said Martin E. Sullivan, the museum's director. "We don't want to shy away from anything that is controversial, but we want to focus on the museum's and this show's strengths."
An 11-second portion of the video shows a small crucifix covered with ants. The video is included in the exhibit, "Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture."
Boehner's spokesman, Kevin Smith, said in a statement that the congressman was monitoring the episode. "American families have a right to expect better from recipients of taxpayer funds in a tough economy," Smith said. "While the amount of money involved may be small, it's symbolic of the arrogance Washington routinely applies to thousands of spending decisions involving Americans' hard-earned money."
"Hide/Seek" is the first survey at a national museum to examine same-sex portraits and intimacy. Artists represented include contemporary names such as Andy Warhol and Annie Leibovitz as well as works from 19th-century artists including Thomas Eakins.
Wojnarowicz, an artist in New York's East Village scene of the 1980s, was 37 when he died of AIDS in 1992.
The largest and most expensive exhibition in the Portrait Gallery's history, the show represented a significant change for a museum known for its staid portraits.
ad_icon
The exhibition, which opened Oct. 30, was funded by the largest number of individual donors for a Portrait Gallery show. The show, which cost $750,000, was also underwritten by foundations that support gay and lesbian issues.
The skirmish over the video could forecast a renewed battle over arts funding when the Republican-led House takes over in January.
In the 1990s, Congress was embroiled in a debate over the National Endowment for the Arts. The agency lost 40 percent of its funding after many politicians were outraged over 1989 exhibits of the work of photographers Robert Mapplethorpe, who focused on homoerotic subjects, and Andres Serrano, who submerged a crucifix in his own urine and took a photo of the composition that he named "Piss Christ."
The era also saw an uproar over a 1999 show at the Brooklyn Museum of Art that included a painting of the Virgin Mary decorated with elephant dung. New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani lost a political battle to take away the museum's funding.
The Smithsonian defended the current show and Wojnarowicz's work. "The artist was very angry about AIDS and he was using that style to create a statement about suffering. His approach was based on a lot of imagery that is very Latin American, and it can be garish and unsettling," said Sullivan.
News reports and calls were becoming a distraction to the major themes of the show, he said.
"The calls and e-mails are suggesting that this was deliberately offensive on the part of the Smithsonian and we had it up during the Christmas holidays to be deliberately sacrilegious," Sullivan said.
The decision to remove the video was made after Sullivan consulted with Richard Kurin, a Smithsonian undersecretary, and representatives of the offices of government affairs and communications.
The Catholic League objected to the "homoerotic images" and said the exhibition offended Christians. Donohue, in an interview Tuesday after the video was removed, said he had watched it on YouTube and that "the material is vile."
He called on the House and Senate appropriations committees to reconsider future funding for the Smithsonian.
"My immediate concern has been relieved. But this is hate speech," Donohue said. "It is designed to insult. This is a sad commentary on the judgment of the Smithsonian."
As part of the Smithsonian, the gallery receives public funds. Overall, the Smithsonian gets about 70 percent of its annual budget from the federal government, but it does not use that money for exhibitions.
Kurin, who also viewed the video Tuesday, said: "We are sensitive to what the public thinks about our shows and programs. We stand behind the show. It has strong scholarship with great pieces by artists who are recognized by a whole panoply of experts. It represents a segment of America."